FOOTBALL · IN DEPTH
Eleven Days In: The Biggest Surprises (and Disappointments) of the Group Stage
Photo: Leti Padilla / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Opinion

Eleven Days In: The Biggest Surprises (and Disappointments) of the Group Stage

Eleven days into the biggest World Cup ever staged, the 48-team group stage has already delivered upsets, underwhelming favourites and a few statement performances. Here's what's stood out so far.

Eleven days and dozens of matches into this World Cup, the group stage is starting to take shape — and it has not gone entirely to script. With 12 groups all moving at once, it is easy to lose track of the bigger picture between individual results. So here is my running read on who has overperformed, who has underwhelmed, and what it's telling us before the final round of group games and the new Round of 32 arrive.

The favourites who've made it look hard

Some of the pre-tournament contenders have won, but not convincingly. Grinding past a game plan built entirely around frustrating you is a different test than cruising past it, and a few of the nations installed among the favourites have spent more of their opening matches defending leads than building them. That is not a crisis — group-stage form has never reliably predicted who lifts the trophy — but it is a reminder that the gap between "favourite" and "win the group comfortably" is wider in a 48-team field than it used to be in a 32-team one.

The dark horses making expansion look smart

This is the flip side, and it is the more enjoyable story. A handful of nations who qualified on the back of the expanded format — sides that, under the old 32-team structure, would likely have stayed home — have looked entirely comfortable on this stage. Disciplined defensively, dangerous on the break, and clearly unburdened by the weight of expectation that sits on the bigger federations. These are exactly the storylines FIFA was hoping expansion would produce, and so far the bigger field is delivering them.

Hosts under the microscope

Co-hosting brings a specific kind of scrutiny, and all three host nations have felt it in different ways — home advantage cuts both ways when an entire country is watching every touch. Whichever of the three handles that pressure best over the next round of matches will say a lot about how the rest of their tournament goes.

The best-third race is already getting interesting

The new wrinkle in this format — eight of the twelve third-placed teams advancing to the Round of 32 — is already doing exactly what it was designed to do: keeping more groups meaningful into the final round. A side sitting third after two matches is not out of this tournament, and that has visibly changed how some teams are approaching games they might once have written off.

Where this leaves things

Two rounds of group games in, my honest take is that the bigger field hasn't diluted the drama so much as redistributed it — there have been fewer "statement" results from the traditional powers and more from everyone else. That's a trade I'll happily take. The final round of group matches, and the scramble for those eight best-third spots, should tell us a lot more about which of these early trends are real and which were just a good week.

world cup 2026opiniongroup stageanalysis48 teams

Related